Skip to main content

Heat Transfer and Kitchen Pans

I know what you look forward to at this time of year: hot apple cider, chestnuts roasting over an open fire, and discussions of heat transfer. Not heat transfer, you say? Too bad, I'm on a tear. For the moment, let’s stick to two metals: cast iron and stainless steel. Cast iron isn’t really steel since it lacks some other added elements but it does contain carbon. Stainless steel isn’t a single material---several different alloys or recipes are used---but those differences don’t make much difference at the level of detail for which we operate. Heat capacity measures the ability to store heat. The higher the heat capacity, the more heat a pan can store. Some measurements of heat capacity for various materials can be found here. The bottom line is that, for our purposes, cast iron and stainless steel have equivalent heat capacities. Based on this mechanism, cast iron and stainless steel pans should provide equal performance---both heating up and cooling down at the same rate. However, heat capacity isn’t the only mechanism at play. The pans will lose heat as the stove pumps heat in. Several heat loss mechanisms are at work. A surprising one is emissivity, a surface property of the material. Shiny surfaces have lower emissivities than do rough surfaces. This reference shows that cast iron’s emissivity is about 9 times higher than that of stainless steel. As a result, the cast iron pan emits more energy to the environment as it is heated.
I ran a simple test to better understand the thermal characteristics of these types of skillets. I used this simple setup to measure temperature. I placed each skillet on a maximum-heat burner for 60 seconds, then removed it and let it cool for another 180 seconds. I recorded temperature every 10 seconds. Here is a plot for temperature of my stainless steel and cast iron skillets:
You can see that the stainless steel skillet heated up faster and reached a much higher temperature after one minute than did the cast iron p skillet an. But this plot is a little misleading because the skillets don’t weigh the same: the stainless steel pa skillet n weighs 30.6 oz while the cast iron skillet comes in at 85.8 oz. Heat capacity is defined per unit weight. Just as a smaller swimming pool can be filled up faster than can a larger one, the heat from the burner produces more temperature rise in the skillet that weighs less. This plot normalizes the stainless steel skillet temperature for weight:
The normalized temperature of the stainless steel skillet is below that of the cast iron. The lower emissivity of the shiny stainless steel means that it puts out less heat. The moral we can draw from this sojourn into physics is that you like your cast iron pan not because of the material with which it is made but because of its weight and texture. You could make a stainless steel pan behave more like cast iron with two treatments: weld a slug of metal onto the bottom, then sandblast the whole thing. Of course, you wouldn’t do that to a fancy, expensive stainless steel pan. Or would I?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eating Around Georgia Tech: Ecco

Our Texas Instruments colleague Cathy Wicks was gracious enough to host several of us at Ecco tonight. This is one of those restaurants that has been on my list for a long time. Even though it is within easy walking distance of Georgia Tech, I hadn't made it there until tonight. The menu is a combination of Italian, Spanish, and French that make use of some local Georgia ingredients. The combination of those three countries is sometimes a little forced, although the georgia ingredients (fruit, cheese) were all great and perfectly appropriate. We started out with a meat and cheese board. This actually reverses the French tradition, where cheese usually follows the main course. Everything was excellent. The Georgia cheese was a big hit, as was the French cow/goat cheese. I thought the sauscisson was very subtle and very good. The waitress said that the roast pork pasta was their signature dish, so I had to try it. It had traditional broad pasta (fresh, of course)

Pressure Cooker Candied Ginger

I made candied ginger a few years ago. It's not something I would do every day but I had a lot of fun doing it. I recently acquired a pressure cooker and it inspired an interesting idea to me: why not make candied ginger in the pressure cooker? It should be very soft and flavorful. Here is the result. I peeled two large ginger roots, cut them into small cubes, and put them in the pressure cooker with heavily sugared water. The traditional method first boils the ginger in plain water to soften it and then again in sugar water to candy it. The resulting candy was very tender but still with the characteristic ginger texture. It was also sweet without being overpowering. The traditional method leaves a lot of sugar crystallized around the ginger. The pressure cooker gives a much more subtle result. The ginger stays moist even after it cools but you can dry it in the oven at 350 degrees for about 10 minutes. That inspired me to dip it in chocolate. While I was in the b

DCA: Cava Mezze Grill

Cava is a DC area chain with light Mediterranean food. Saibal encouraged me to try lunch at their airport location and I was very happy with the experience. I ordered falafel on SuperSalad with assorted other toppings. The falafel was tasty. The SuperSalad was light, flavorful, and very easy to eat. Overall, a healthy and enjoyable lunch, something you can't always say about airport eating.